Here are some things to consider:
Wait a minute … what do you mean with that last one? The cost method makes a difference in cardex analysis?
As it turns out, it sure does. If standard costs (07) are used, then the balances on the top of the item ledger screen will always agree to the details, no matter if you filter the results to the branch, location or even the lot number. If average costs (02) are used, then you must also know the cost level of the item to filter the item ledger properly. Consider this example:
Let’s say you have a new average cost item with lot control turned on and the cost level set to 2 (item branch). You receive 1 at $100 for Lot A1. The average cost changes from 0 to $100. Then you do a second receipt for 1 at $110, Lot A2. Your inventory data looks like this:
Doc Type |
Lot |
Quantity |
Cost |
Running Balance |
Avg Cost |
|
Start |
0 |
$0 |
||||
OV |
A1 |
1 |
$100 |
1 |
$100 |
|
OV |
A2 |
1 |
$110 |
2 |
$105 |
|
End |
2 |
$105 |
Now the ending balance of 2 agrees with the sum of the cardex transactions correct? But if you filter the item ledger on an individual lot, then each one is off by $5:
Lot |
Cardex Total Cost |
Quantity |
Avg Cost |
Value |
Variance |
A1 |
$100 |
1 |
$105 |
$105 |
($5) |
A2 |
$110 |
1 |
$105 |
$105 |
$5 |
Is there an issue …no! JD Edwards does not go back and ‘rebalance’ the lots when the average cost changes. So the moral of the story … in an average cost environment, you must be aware of an items cost level and filter accordingly in order do a proper analysis!